I imagine Kourtney Kardashian’s sisters have mixed feelings about her “this is not a publicity stunt but my show is coming out soon and I forgot to take the pill” pregnancy. On “Keeping up with the Kardashians,” Scott Disik, the baby daddy, is painted as a philandering D-bag, and I’m really not on board with his decision to wear man jewelry. They broke up briefly, but it appears that they reconciled their differences.
Apparently the surprise pregnancy really freaked out Kourtney (obviously), and she seriously considered getting an abortion. She never considered adoption, and decided that, as a 30 year old woman, she had the wherewithal to keep the baby, saying, “For me, all the reasons why I wouldn’t keep the baby were so selfish… it’s not like I’m 16. I’m 30 years old, I make my own money, I support myself, I can afford to have a baby. And I’m with someone who I love.”
It seems her logic is that abortions are a much more viable option for anyone who does not fit those age-based, economic, and relationship status reasons.
Interestingly, big sis Khloe Kardashian recently posed nude for PETA. Critics blasted her as a hypocrite, as she was big into the skinned-animal trend in previous years. Reformed Khloe said education opened her eyes to the practice of fur harvesting. Kim and Kourtney eventually followed suit when pressured from Khloe, and cited reasons to ditch their fur fixes as the killing of animals is wrong.

You can stand wherever you want to on these issues, but to be clear, Kourtney is okay with terminating a developing baby’s life, but let’s definitely never kill any animals for versatile, stylish, fabulous, and warmth-providing fur coats?
Seems reasonable.